People may abandon the weaker ones instead of confronting those of equal strength because it may be perceived as less risky or challenging. Confronting someone of equal strength can lead to a more intense and potentially dangerous situation, whereas abandoning the weaker individual may seem like an easier way out. Additionally, people may feel more confident in their ability to overpower or dominate someone who is weaker, leading them to choose this option instead of facing a more evenly matched opponent. Ultimately, it may come down to a lack of empathy or a desire to avoid conflict and maintain a sense of power or control. **

People often abandon the weaker ones instead of confronting those who are equally strong because it may seem easier or less risky to avoid conflict with someone who is equally strong. Confronting someone who is equally strong can be intimidating and may lead to a difficult or prolonged conflict. Additionally, people may feel a sense of loyalty or protection towards those who are weaker and may not want to engage in a confrontation that could potentially harm them. Ultimately, it may be a combination of fear, avoidance, and a desire to protect the vulnerable that leads people to abandon the weaker ones instead of confronting those who are equally strong. **

Horizontal mergers can lead to economies of scale, increased market power, and the ability to eliminate competition. By combining two companies that operate in the same industry, the merged entity can benefit from cost savings and increased efficiency. On the other hand, vertical mergers can result in better control over the supply chain, reduced transaction costs, and improved coordination between different stages of production. This can lead to improved quality control, lower production costs, and increased market access. Both types of mergers can result in increased market share and potentially higher profits for the merged entity. **

In a free market economy, it can be justified to restrict market and entrepreneurial freedom through the requirement for approval in larger mergers in order to prevent monopolies and promote fair competition. Without such restrictions, larger companies could potentially use their market power to stifle competition, leading to higher prices and reduced consumer choice. By requiring approval for larger mergers, regulators can ensure that the market remains competitive and that smaller businesses have the opportunity to thrive. This can ultimately benefit consumers and the overall economy. **